Feet and Faces

[tyler]

Originally Posted by SoleSolution

I think that in cases where the pics were shot by a "reputable" Foot fetishist, who you know loves Female Feet and would have no need to post a guys Feet, it's ok if there is no face in the shots.

that is by far the best point I've heard correlated to the whole feet and face debate. and it is very true too. basically what everyone ultimately wants is female authenticity.

many automatically assume that authenticity has to be validated by a female body or face. however, many often overlook the fact that photographer reputation can also be a very validating thing.

i've recently been chastized in another forum for asking neutral questions of a "feet + no face" advocate and he sorta polarized me on the "feet must have face" side of the debate.

it's funny that I am able to come read this great perspective by SoleSolution and realize one of the biggest mediating points to this debate is that authenticity can be increased by the poster's reputation or credibility.

[smellnylonfeet]

My opinion on this subject is; I like the FACE to be shown as well as the FEET and PIGGIE's. Cause a girls pretty face is at least 1/2 of the decision on if I would smell, suck, lick, kiss, sniff, and CUM on her feetsie's