I was wondering if you like it more when you have a photo of the lady's feet and her face in the same shot. I looked at one of the polls on feetcore, and the results of it pretty much said you did. I was wondering, if not having the lady's face in the picture was a turn-off or if it made no difference. Whatcha think?

me personally, i like the feet and face to be shown when possible.

the reason i prefer it that way is because i've been places where people will try to pass off male feet with painted toenails as female feet and I've heard of lots of straight guys getting duped by wacking off to male feet when they thought it was female.

feet and face would've prevented that for those poor homos ;)

Yeah, ok, I guess I never thought of that. I guess I thought it was cuz guys liked yovng, beautiful ladies, and their yovng beautiful feet. I myself, am neither yovng nor beautiful, well... not anymore.

time marches on, right?
yup.

i can tell your feet are beautiful regardless of age!! And yummy looking too :D

age does indeed march on. I know this personally as I am a fat old slob now, LOL ...I can live with that :D

Thanks for the compliment, tyler, this 'ol gal appreciates it! Feet are as varied as grains of sand. What do you find appealing about ladies feet? Other than the obvious (aroma!) ... ??

other than the sweet pheremone scent which is an addiction for me, i still like a lot of other things like the shape, the well kept nails and and fiest personality of some feet that know how to put a man in his place. here's a great example: http://youtube.com/watch?v=i8cpkQfCnIw

That thought has crossed my on occasions. You see a picture or a clip where they only show feet but there are some unlady like body traits, or it may seem at least. when I encounter this I just move right along. besides its always nice to get to see that face that goes with those feet. I say as long as you can tell they are "her" feet there is no complaints.

There can be many sublte features about a womens foot that makes it sexy and it varies from guy to guy or gal to gal, whatever. For me I like many others like arches and evenly shaped toes. My favorite part of the female foot is definately the soles, this is difficult to explain though.

A SOLE SCRUNCHING POSE IS THE BEST OVERALL

Tyler is right feet are sexy regardless of age. If they are well kept then they can be sexy.

Feet can be timeless

Thank you, eadster, I appreciate your candor.

Some guys absolutely hate Feet shots without faces... I'm not one of those guys. I understand Tyler's concern about dudes posting their Feet and trying to pass them off as a Woman's Feet, but I think that in cases where the pics were shot by a "reputable" Foot fetishist, who you know loves Female Feet and would have no need to post a guys Feet, it's ok if there is no face in the shots. For example.. a couple of my favorite sites are realfeet and wowfeet... I know the guys that run these sites are true Foot lovers to the core.. and sometimes they will run shots without faces... that's ok... Sometimes the Women don't want their faces shown.

In another thread I wrote about shooting candids... I never show faces in my candids because I like close up Sole/Toe shots...(and because I don't want to compromise their privacy... Face is personal, Feet are universal) I don't have a reason to shoot a dudes Feet because I love Women's Feet... I just think that the Feet can be appreciated without seeing the faces. What if you saw a shot in which a Woman had (what you consider) absolutely gorgeous Feet, but she wasn't attractive at all.. Would that detract from the beauty of her Feet? I would say no. I've seen many unattractive Women with gorgeous Feet in real life and on the net.

Don't get me wrong.. Feet n' Face shots are nice... I like 'em like the next guy... but they aren't absolutely necessary for me to appreciate the Feet.

SS

I think that in cases where the pics were shot by a "reputable" Foot fetishist, who you know loves Female Feet and would have no need to post a guys Feet, it's ok if there is no face in the shots. that is by far the best point I've heard correlated to the whole feet and face debate. and it is very true too. basically what everyone ultimately wants is female authenticity.

many automatically assume that authenticity has to be validated by a female body or face. however, many often overlook the fact that photographer reputation can also be a very validating thing.

i've recently been chastized in another forum for asking neutral questions of a "feet + no face" advocate and he sorta polarized me on the "feet must have face" side of the debate.

it's funny that I am able to come read this great perspective by SoleSolution and realize one of the biggest mediating points to this debate is that authenticity can be increased by the poster's reputation or credibility.

:) My opinion on this subject is; I like the FACE to be shown as well as the FEET and PIGGIE's. Cause a girls pretty face is at least 1/2 of the decision on if I would smell, suck, lick, kiss, sniff, and CUM on her feetsie's:P