View Full Version : BIG pt 2..
Ikebana
Feb 1st, 2006, 4:03PM, PST
Tyler imagined taking a face full of the last one... imagine him taking a face full of these sweaty soles!! :pinch: http://www.feetcore.com/components/com_joomlaboard/uploaded/images/hard.jpg
tyler
Feb 1st, 2006, 6:06PM, PST
OMG, I would love it! You got any of this girls face and legs?!
Ikebana
Feb 2nd, 2006, 3:04AM, PST
Will dig deep G. This was to hand though.. gives you more of a sense of scale of her feet which makes you want to crawl into a ball in awe. :) What d'ya say to this - What do you like about it? http://www.feetcore.com/components/com_joomlaboard/uploaded/images/BIG3.jpg
Post edited by: ikebana, at: 2006/02/02 02:06
Ikebana
Feb 2nd, 2006, 3:06AM, PST
...reminds me of Ally Doehr a little...hmmm... this gal is a size 12 methinks, check out the size and weight and those long flexible gripping toes! Another quality post so enjoy Tyler and peeps :)
Post edited by: ikebana, at: 2006/02/02 02:10
Post edited by: ikebana, at: 2006/02/02 02:13
tyler
Feb 2nd, 2006, 4:33AM, PST
Proportionately long and slender are the best characteristics I like about big feet. I'm not into big-footed girls that have Yeti type feet though... ya know thick, flat, and stumpy.
Ikebana
Feb 2nd, 2006, 4:50AM, PST
no offence to all the short and stumpy toed girls but feminine and elegant, long is the way to some degree I agree... I hope i'm not going OTT with the picture posts Tyler? Other fellow comrades posts seem to be of a much different taste to mine... I wanted to add another flavour, reprazent if you know what i mean. B)
Post edited by: ikebana, at: 2006/02/02 03:59
tyler
Feb 2nd, 2006, 4:53AM, PST
Ikebana wrote:
feminine and elegant to some degree I agreeYeah, her feet were long and slender and that is a good thing. Nice and feminine too!
Ikebana wrote:
did you take a look at my post on the subject of toe-wrestling or foot wars as an idea - or does that not really appeal to you?It's a possibility (http://www.feetcore.com/index.php?option=com_joomlaboard&Itemid=163&func=v iew&catid=4&id=285#285), but not likely to be in the immediate future.